Citroen C6 2005 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Citroen C6 is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C6 engine produces 33 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Thanks to more power Citroen C6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Citroen C6 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C6 could require 165 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen C6 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| 1020 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Volkswagen Sharan 2010 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Sharan 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.74 m | |
| Citroen C6 is 6 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C6 is 28 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 407 litres | 809 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen C6 has 402 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan. This could mean that the Citroen C6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C6 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Citroen C6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`280 | 2`340 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C6 has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |