Citroen C6 2005 vs Volvo XC60 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Citroen C6 is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo XC60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 - 241 HP | 163 - 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 - 450 NM | 300 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 11.2 seconds | 7.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 11.2 | 6.0 - 11.9 | |
|
Citroen C6 petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, Citroen C6 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.71 m | |
| Citroen C6 is 28 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C6 is 25 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 407 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen C6 has 88 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. This could mean that the Citroen C6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C6 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`309 | ~ 2`499 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C6 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |