Citroen C6 2005 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Citroen C6
2005 - 2013
Volkswagen Sharan
2010 -
Body: HatchbackMinivan / MPV
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.2 - 3.01.4 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 170 - 241 HP140 - 200 HP
Torque: 290 - 450 NM240 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 - 11.2 seconds8.3 - 10.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.6 - 11.25.5 - 8.4
Citroen C6 petrol engines consumes on average 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Sharan. On average, Citroen C6 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.91 m4.85 m
Width: 1.86 m1.90 m
Height: 1.46 m1.74 m
Citroen C6 is 6 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C6 is 28 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 407 litres809 litres
Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Citroen C6 has 402 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan. This could mean that the Citroen C6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 12.4 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen C6 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Citroen C6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`309~ 2`337
Safety:
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 400014 000
Pros and Cons: Citroen C6 has
  • lower price
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv