Citroen C5 Aircross 2025 vs Skoda Kodiaq 2024
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Citroen C5 Aircross) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Skoda Kodiaq) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C5 Aircross engine produces 57 HP less power than Skoda Kodiaq, whereas torque is 170 NM less than Skoda Kodiaq. Due to the lower power, Citroen C5 Aircross reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.6 | |
|
The Citroen C5 Aircross is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C5 Aircross consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Kodiaq, which means that by driving the Citroen C5 Aircross over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| Citroen C5 Aircross gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
| Citroen C5 Aircross is 11 cm shorter than the Skoda Kodiaq, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen C5 Aircross is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 565 litres | 845 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1668 litres | 2035 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage space. Citroen C5 Aircross has 280 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Kodiaq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 367 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`100 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 35 200 | 38 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 Aircross has
|
Skoda Kodiaq has
| |