Citroen C5 Aircross 2025 vs BMW X3 2025
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
BMW X3 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C5 Aircross engine produces 54 HP less power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 80 NM less than BMW X3. Due to the lower power, Citroen C5 Aircross reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 8.2 | |
|
The Citroen C5 Aircross is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C5 Aircross consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that by driving the Citroen C5 Aircross over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| Citroen C5 Aircross gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Citroen C5 Aircross) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW X3) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross is smaller, but slightly higher. Citroen C5 Aircross is 11 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C5 Aircross is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 565 litres | 570 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1668 litres | 1700 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.2 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`100 kg | 2`425 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`554 kg | 1`780 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 546 kg | 645 kg | |
| Citroen C5 Aircross load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem less than BMW X3. Therefore, BMW X3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 35 200 | 44 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 Aircross has
|
BMW X3 has
| |