Citroen C5 Aircross 2018 vs Renault Koleos 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C5 Aircross engine produces 4 HP more power than Renault Koleos, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Renault Koleos. Thanks to more power Citroen C5 Aircross reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C5 Aircross is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C5 Aircross consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos, which means that by driving the Citroen C5 Aircross over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C5 Aircross consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C5 Aircross gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 3008, Opel Grandland | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Koleos might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Koleos 2013 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C5 Aircross is 2 cm shorter than the Renault Koleos, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C5 Aircross is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1380 litres | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Citroen C5 Aircross has 130 litres more trunk space than the Renault Koleos. The Renault Koleos may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C5 Aircross is 0.9 metres less than that of the Renault Koleos, which means Citroen C5 Aircross can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Citroen C5 Aircross is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 Aircross has
|
Renault Koleos has
| |