Citroen C5 Aircross 2018 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C5 Aircross engine produces 47 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Renault Kadjar. Thanks to more power Citroen C5 Aircross reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Kadjar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C5 Aircross consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C5 Aircross could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C5 Aircross consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1390 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1530 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kadjar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 186 mm (7.3 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Kadjar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Kadjar version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C5 Aircross engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 3008, Opel Grandland | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Renault Kadjar 2015 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Renault Kadjar 2015 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross is larger. Citroen C5 Aircross is 5 cm longer than the Renault Kadjar, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen C5 Aircross is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1478 litres | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross has more luggage capacity. Citroen C5 Aircross has 108 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | 1`946 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Citroen C5 Aircross is better rated in child safety tests. The Citroen C5 Aircross scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 24 000 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 Aircross has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |