Citroen C5 Aircross 2018 vs Mazda CX-5 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C5 Aircross engine produces 2 HP more power than Mazda CX-5, but torque is 20 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Thanks to more power Citroen C5 Aircross reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C5 Aircross is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C5 Aircross consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Citroen C5 Aircross over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C5 Aircross consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2017: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 186 mm (7.3 inches) | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C5 Aircross engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 3008, Opel Grandland | Used also on Mazda 6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C5 Aircross might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C5 Aircross is 5 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen C5 Aircross is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 506 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Citroen C5 Aircross has 74 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The Mazda CX-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C5 Aircross is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | 2`143 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Citroen C5 Aircross is better rated in child safety tests. The Citroen C5 Aircross scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 22 800 | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 Aircross has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |