Citroen C5 Aircross 2018 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 181 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C5 Aircross engine produces 51 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Renault Kadjar. Thanks to more power Citroen C5 Aircross reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Kadjar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C5 Aircross consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C5 Aircross could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C5 Aircross consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kadjar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 186 mm (7.3 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Kadjar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Kadjar version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross is larger. Citroen C5 Aircross is 5 cm longer than the Renault Kadjar, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen C5 Aircross is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1478 litres | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross has more luggage capacity. Citroen C5 Aircross has 108 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 1`903 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Citroen C5 Aircross is better rated in child safety tests. The Citroen C5 Aircross scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 24 000 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 Aircross has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |