Citroen C5 Aircross 2018 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C5 Aircross engine produces 21 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Renault Kadjar. Thanks to more power Citroen C5 Aircross reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 3.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 5.5 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Kadjar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C5 Aircross consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C5 Aircross could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C5 Aircross consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1260 km in combined cycle | 1570 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 1660 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 1090 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kadjar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 186 mm (7.3 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Kadjar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Kadjar version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Combo, Citroen Berlingo, Opel Grandland | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kadjar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Citroen C5 Aircross engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Kadjar 2015 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Kadjar 2015 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross is larger. Citroen C5 Aircross is 5 cm longer than the Renault Kadjar, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen C5 Aircross is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1630 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross has more luggage capacity. Citroen C5 Aircross has 108 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C5 Aircross (by 152 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`000 kg | 1`916 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`430 kg | 1`380 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 570 kg | 536 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Citroen C5 Aircross is better rated in child safety tests. The Citroen C5 Aircross scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 Aircross has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |