Citroen C5 Aircross 2018 vs Mazda CX-5 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C5 Aircross engine produces 44 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Due to the lower power, Citroen C5 Aircross reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C5 Aircross is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C5 Aircross consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Citroen C5 Aircross over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C5 Aircross consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1320 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1390 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C5 Aircross gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2017: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 186 mm (7.3 inches) | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C5 Aircross is 5 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen C5 Aircross is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 506 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Citroen C5 Aircross has 74 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The Mazda CX-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C5 Aircross is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | 2`143 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Citroen C5 Aircross is better rated in child safety tests. The Citroen C5 Aircross scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 24 000 | 24 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 Aircross has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |