Citroen C5 Aircross 2018 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Citroen C5 Aircross engine produces 1 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Renault Kadjar. Despite the higher power, Citroen C5 Aircross reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C5 Aircross is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C5 Aircross consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar, which means that by driving the Citroen C5 Aircross over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C5 Aircross consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kadjar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 186 mm (7.3 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Kadjar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Kadjar version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C5 Aircross might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross is larger. Citroen C5 Aircross is 5 cm longer than the Renault Kadjar, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen C5 Aircross is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1478 litres | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross has more luggage capacity. Citroen C5 Aircross has 108 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`853 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Citroen C5 Aircross is better rated in child safety tests. The Citroen C5 Aircross scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 25 600 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 Aircross has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |