Citroen C5 Aircross 2017 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Citroen C5 Aircross is available only with front wheel drive, while Renault Kadjar can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Citroen C5 Aircross is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 - 204 HP | 110 - 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 400 NM | 205 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 10.6 seconds | 9.9 - 11.9 seconds | |
| In general, Citroen C5 Aircross are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Renault Kadjar. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.8 - 7.5 | 3.8 - 5.6 | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Kadjar. On average, Citroen C5 Aircross equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 186 - 230 mm (7.3 - 9.1 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Kadjar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross is larger. Citroen C5 Aircross is 5 cm longer than the Renault Kadjar, 2 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C5 Aircross is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1630 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross has more luggage capacity. Citroen C5 Aircross has 108 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C5 Aircross (by 152 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`000 kg | ~ 1`935 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`492 kg | ~ 1`409 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 508 kg | ~ 526 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Citroen C5 Aircross is better rated in child safety tests. The Citroen C5 Aircross scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 Aircross has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |