Citroen C5 Aircross 2017 vs Ford Kuga 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Citroen C5 Aircross is available only with front wheel drive, while Ford Kuga can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 1.5 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Citroen C5 Aircross is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 - 204 HP | 120 - 242 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 400 NM | 230 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 10.6 seconds | 8.8 - 12.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.8 - 7.5 | 4.4 - 8.7 | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Kuga. On average, Citroen C5 Aircross equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C5 Aircross is 2 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 2 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C5 Aircross is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1630 litres | 1653 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Ford Kuga may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 23 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C5 Aircross is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Citroen C5 Aircross can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`000 kg | ~ 2`207 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`492 kg | ~ 1`670 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 508 kg | ~ 537 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Kuga scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C5 Aircross has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |