Citroen C4 2008 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2005
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 138 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Citroen C4 engine produces 43 HP more power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Despite the higher power, Citroen C4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C4 could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Citroen C4 is larger, but lower. Citroen C4 is 46 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 7 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1083 litres | 760 litres | |
|
Citroen C4 has more luggage capacity. Citroen C4 has 130 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C4 (by 323 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`835 | 1`545 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |