Citroen C4 2012 vs Volvo S60 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Citroen C4) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Volvo S60) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C4 engine produces 47 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 250 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Citroen C4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C4 could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1470 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Citroen C4 is smaller, but slightly higher. Citroen C4 and Volvo S60 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 380 litres | |
|
Citroen C4 has more luggage capacity. Citroen C4 has 60 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`790 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |