Citroen C4 2015 vs Skoda Rapid 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C4 engine produces 36 HP more power than Skoda Rapid, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Skoda Rapid. Thanks to more power Citroen C4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Rapid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C4 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1500 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Citroen C4 2015 1.2 engine: Since the timing belt is immersed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to excessive axial play in the ... More about Citroen C4 2015 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Citroen C4 is larger. Citroen C4 is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Rapid, 8 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 408 litres | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1183 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, Citroen C4 has 7 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. This could mean that the Citroen C4 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Skoda Rapid. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`790 | 1`625 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Rapid has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Skoda Rapid, so Skoda Rapid quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |