Citroen C4 2010 vs Fiat Bravo 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 206 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Fiat Bravo is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C4 and Fiat Bravo have the same engine power, but Citroen C4 torque is 46 NM less than Fiat Bravo. Citroen C4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Bravo, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Bravo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso, Peugeot 3008, Peugeot 2008 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Fiat Grande Punto, Alfa Romeo Giulietta, Alfa Romeo MiTo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C4 and Fiat Bravo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1183 litres | no data | |
| Citroen C4 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Bravo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Fiat Bravo, which means Citroen C4 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`765 | 1`785 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Fiat Bravo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Fiat Bravo, so Fiat Bravo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 has
|
Fiat Bravo has
| |