Citroen C4 2008 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C4 engine produces 5 HP more power than Chrysler PT Cruiser, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Chrysler PT Cruiser. Thanks to more power Citroen C4 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso, Peugeot 3008 | Used also on Chrysler Neon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.60 m | |
| Citroen C4 is 2 cm shorter than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, 7 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 538 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1023 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has more luggage space. Citroen C4 has 218 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`731 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Citroen C4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler PT Cruiser has serious deffects in 125 percent more cases than Citroen C4, so Citroen C4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |