Citroen C4 2004 vs Volvo C30 2006

 
Citroen C4
2004 - 2008
Volvo C30
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 110 HP125 HP
Torque: 147 NM165 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.9 seconds10.8 seconds
Volvo C30 is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen C4 engine produces 15 HP less power than Volvo C30, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Volvo C30. Due to the lower power, Citroen C4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.17.3
Real fuel consumption: 7.8 l/100km8.2 l/100km
The Citroen C4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Citroen C4 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 840 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
1050 km on highway960 km on highway
760 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption
Citroen C4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Engine production duration: 15 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo V50, Volvo S40
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Citroen C4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Citroen C4 2004 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ...  More about Citroen C4 2004 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.27 m4.25 m
Width: 1.77 m1.78 m
Height: 1.46 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C4 is 2 cm longer than the Volvo C30, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 320 litres251 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1023 litresno data
Citroen C4 has more luggage capacity.
Citroen C4 has 69 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C30.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen C4 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo C30.
Power steering: Electric power steeringHydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7321`700
Safety:
Quality:
low

below average
Volvo C30 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Volvo C30, so Volvo C30 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 20003200
Pros and Cons: Citroen C4 has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • electric power steering
  • lower price
Volvo C30 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • hydraulic power steering
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv