Citroen C4 2020 vs Skoda Scala 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
| Citroen C4 engine produces 15 HP more power than Skoda Scala. Despite the higher power, Citroen C4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Scala is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Citroen C4 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Scala, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen C4 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Scala. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.47 m | |
| Citroen C4 and Skoda Scala are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 467 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Scala has more luggage space. Citroen C4 has 87 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Scala. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`735 | 1`668 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 200 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 has
|
Skoda Scala has
| |