Citroen C4 2015 vs Volvo S60 2015
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 152 HP | |
Torque: | 230 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
Citroen C4 engine produces 16 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo S60. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.8 | |
The Citroen C4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C4 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 67 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.59 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.80 m | 1.48 m | |
Citroen C4 is smaller, but higher. Citroen C4 is 4 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 is 32 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 443 litres | 380 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1749 litres | |
Citroen C4 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Citroen C4 has 63 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.3 meters | |
Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`110 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 7400 | 11 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |