Citroen C4 2016 vs Volvo S60 2013

 
Citroen C4
2016 - 2020
Volvo S60
2013 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 240 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.1 seconds10.2 seconds
Citroen C4 and Volvo S60 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Citroen C4 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.56.8
Citroen C4 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres67 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 920 km in combined cycle980 km in combined cycle
1170 km on highway1240 km on highway
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.63 m
Width: 1.79 m1.87 m
Height: 1.52 m1.48 m
Citroen C4 is 1 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 440 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1749 litres
Citroen C4 has more luggage capacity.
Citroen C4 has 60 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: no data11.3 meters
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8102`030
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 740012 600
Pros and Cons: Citroen C4 has
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Volvo S60 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • electric power steering
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv