Citroen C4 2016 vs Volvo S60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C4 engine produces 34 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Citroen C4 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.8 | |
| Citroen C4 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.48 m | |
| Citroen C4 is 1 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1749 litres | |
|
Citroen C4 has more luggage capacity. Citroen C4 has 60 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.3 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`805 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |