Citroen C4 2012 vs Mazda 3 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 1.8 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda 3 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 150 HP | 105 - 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 - 240 NM | 145 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.8 seconds | 10.4 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 7.9 | 4.3 - 8.2 | |
|
On average, the Citroen C4 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C4 is 4 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 3 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 430 litres | |
| Citroen C4 has 10 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`847 | ~ 1`794 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |