Citroen C4 2012 vs Citroen C4 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.6 - 1.8 (petrol) | 1.2 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 - 150 HP | 92 - 156 HP | |
Torque: | 150 - 240 NM | 135 - 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.8 seconds | 8.6 - 12.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 7.9 | 3.7 - 6.9 | |
Citroen C4 2012 petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C4 2010. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.62 m | 4.33 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.49 m | |
Citroen C4 2012 is 29 cm longer than the Citroen C4 2010, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 380 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1183 litres | |
Citroen C4 2012 has more luggage capacity. Citroen C4 2012 has 60 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4 2010. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`847 | ~ 1`806 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 4600 | 4600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 has
|
Citroen C4 has
| |