Citroen C4 2015 vs Volvo S60 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Citroen C4
2015 - 2020
Volvo S60
2013 - 2018
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Citroen C4 is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo S60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.2 - 1.61.5 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 114 - 150 HP115 - 304 HP
Torque: 150 - 270 NM220 - 440 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.1 - 12.5 seconds5.9 - 12.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.8 - 7.13.7 - 9.9
Citroen C4 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S60. On average, Citroen C4 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.63 m
Width: 1.79 m1.87 m
Height: 1.61 m1.48 m
Citroen C4 is smaller, but higher.
Citroen C4 and Volvo S60 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 443 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1749 litres
Citroen C4 has more luggage capacity.
Citroen C4 has 63 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: no data11.3 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`800~ 2`087
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

above average
Average price (€): 740012 600
Pros and Cons: Citroen C4 has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volvo S60 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv