Citroen C4 2015 vs Volvo S60 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Citroen C4 is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo S60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.5 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 114 - 150 HP | 115 - 304 HP | |
Torque: | 150 - 270 NM | 220 - 440 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 - 12.5 seconds | 5.9 - 12.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 7.1 | 3.7 - 9.9 | |
Citroen C4 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S60. On average, Citroen C4 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.48 m | |
Citroen C4 is smaller, but higher. Citroen C4 and Volvo S60 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 443 litres | 380 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1749 litres | |
Citroen C4 has more luggage capacity. Citroen C4 has 63 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.3 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`800 | ~ 2`087 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 10 400 | 11 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |