Citroen C4 2015 vs Mazda 3 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.5 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 - 150 HP | 104 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 - 270 NM | 144 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 - 12.5 seconds | 8 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 7.1 | 3.8 - 6.3 | |
|
Citroen C4 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Citroen C4 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.45 m | |
| Citroen C4 is 4 cm longer than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen C4 is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 443 litres | 419 litres | |
|
Citroen C4 has more luggage capacity. Citroen C4 has 24 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`800 | ~ 1`846 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 3 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda 3 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |