Citroen C4 2015 vs Mazda 3 2016

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Citroen C4
2015 - 2020
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 1.61.5 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 114 - 150 HP100 - 184 HP
Torque: 150 - 270 NM144 - 380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.1 - 12.5 seconds8 - 13.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.8 - 7.13.8 - 8.1
Citroen C4 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Citroen C4 equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.58 m
Width: 1.79 m1.79 m
Height: 1.61 m1.45 m
Citroen C4 is larger.
Citroen C4 is 5 cm longer than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen C4 is 16 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 443 litres419 litres
Citroen C4 has more luggage capacity.
Citroen C4 has 24 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: no data10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`800~ 1`850
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
Average price (€): 10 40013 000
Pros and Cons: Citroen C4 has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv