Citroen C4 Picasso 2014 vs Volkswagen Touran 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 10 HP more power than Volkswagen Touran, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Volkswagen Touran. Despite the higher power, Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 5.7 | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1240 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is larger, but lower. Citroen C4 Picasso is 3 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touran, 3 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 537 litres | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1710 litres | 1989 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen C4 Picasso has 158 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Touran. This could mean that the Citroen C4 Picasso uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 279 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | 2`220 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Citroen C4 Picasso scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |