Citroen C4 Picasso 2010 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 3 HP more power than Renault Grand Scenic, but torque is 40 NM less than Renault Grand Scenic. Despite the higher power, Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.6 | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C4 Picasso could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C5, Peugeot 3008, Peugeot 508, Citroen DS4 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Grand Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Grand Scenic 2009 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is smaller, but slightly higher. Citroen C4 Picasso is 9 cm shorter than the Renault Grand Scenic, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 208 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 208 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 500 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1734 litres | 2063 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Grand Scenic (by 329 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`150 | 2`251 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Renault Grand Scenic has
| |