Citroen C4 Picasso 2007 vs Ford S-Max 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 138 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Ford S-Max is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 8 HP more power than Ford S-Max, but torque is 50 NM less than Ford S-Max. Despite the higher power, Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C4 Picasso could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford S-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ford S-Max 2007 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford S-Max 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is smaller, but slightly higher. Citroen C4 Picasso is 30 cm shorter than the Ford S-Max, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 854 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 854 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 500 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2100 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford S-Max, so Citroen C4 Picasso quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 3600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |