Citroen C4 Picasso 2007 vs Volkswagen Touran 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 41 HP more power than Volkswagen Touran, whereas torque is 52 NM more than Volkswagen Touran. Despite the higher power, Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 7.9 | |
|
The Volkswagen Touran is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C4 Picasso could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Touran gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 407, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Audi A3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Citroen C4 Picasso 2007 2.0 engine: The Peugeot EW10A (RFJ) is a 2.0-liter naturally aspirated gasoline engine introduced in 2005 as an updated version of the older EW10J4, adapted to meet Euro 4 emissions standards. In general, the engine is considered fairly reliable and uncomplicated for its class, with relatively low repair costs and good overall durability when maintained ... More about Citroen C4 Picasso 2007 2.0 engine Volkswagen Touran 2006 1.6 engine: This engine is simple and reliable, rarely causing significant issues for owners. Fluctuating idle speed is often linked to a clogged fuel pump strainer or air leaks in the intake system. If vibrations or ... More about Volkswagen Touran 2006 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is larger. Citroen C4 Picasso is 6 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touran, 4 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1734 litres | 1989 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Citroen C4 Picasso uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 255 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`090 kg | 2`090 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`552 kg | 1`430 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 538 kg | 660 kg | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem less than Volkswagen Touran. Therefore, Volkswagen Touran is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Volkswagen Touran has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Picasso has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Touran, so Volkswagen Touran quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |