Citroen C4 Picasso 2007 vs Ford S-Max 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Ford S-Max is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 2 HP less power than Ford S-Max, but torque is 10 NM more than Ford S-Max. Due to the lower power, Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 8.1 | |
|
The Ford S-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C4 Picasso could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Ford S-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Citroen C4 Picasso 2007 2.0 engine: The Peugeot EW10A (RFJ) is a 2.0-liter naturally aspirated gasoline engine introduced in 2005 as an updated version of the older EW10J4, adapted to meet Euro 4 emissions standards. In general, the engine is considered fairly reliable and uncomplicated for its class, with relatively low repair costs and good overall durability when maintained ... More about Citroen C4 Picasso 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is smaller, but slightly higher. Citroen C4 Picasso is 30 cm shorter than the Ford S-Max, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 854 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 854 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 500 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1734 litres | 2100 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max (by 366 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`090 kg | 2`340 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`552 kg | 1`605 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 538 kg | 735 kg | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 37 procentiem less than Ford S-Max. Therefore, Ford S-Max is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford S-Max, so Citroen C4 Picasso quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 3000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |