Citroen C4 Picasso 2007 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 191 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 8 HP more power than Renault Grand Scenic, whereas torque is 9 NM more than Renault Grand Scenic. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 8.6 | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Scenic, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C4 Picasso engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 407, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Renault Espace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Grand Scenic 2006 2.0 engine: The F4R 2.0 engine is a relatively simple and reliable unit, capable of lasting up to 400,000 km with proper maintenance. Its design is straightforward, and service is generally accessible. However, several recurring issues ... More about Renault Grand Scenic 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso is 3 cm shorter than the Renault Grand Scenic, 2 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 533 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 533 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 500 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1960 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.6 metres more than that of the Renault Grand Scenic, which means Citroen C4 Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`180 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Renault Grand Scenic has
| |