Citroen C4 Picasso 2007 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Citroen C4 Picasso) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Renault Grand Scenic) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso and Renault Grand Scenic have the same engine power, but Citroen C4 Picasso torque is 88 NM more than Renault Grand Scenic. Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 7.8 | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Scenic, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Grand Scenic 2006 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not particularly demanding on fuel quality.
The most critical ... More about Renault Grand Scenic 2006 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso is 3 cm shorter than the Renault Grand Scenic, 2 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 533 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 533 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 500 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1734 litres | 1960 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Grand Scenic (by 226 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.6 metres more than that of the Renault Grand Scenic, which means Citroen C4 Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`050 kg | 2`125 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`489 kg | 1`445 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 561 kg | 680 kg | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem less than Renault Grand Scenic. Therefore, Renault Grand Scenic is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Renault Grand Scenic has
| |