Citroen C4 Picasso 2007 vs Mazda 5 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda 5 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C4 Picasso and Mazda 5 have the same engine power, but Citroen C4 Picasso torque is 70 NM less than Mazda 5. Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso is 3 cm shorter than the Mazda 5, 7 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 112 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 112 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 500 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1566 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda 5, which means Citroen C4 Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`180 | 2`225 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 5 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Citroen C4 Picasso, so Citroen C4 Picasso quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Mazda 5 has
| |