Citroen C4 Picasso 2007 vs Mazda 5 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Citroen C4 Picasso) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mazda 5) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Mazda 5 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 5 HP less power than Mazda 5, but torque is 75 NM more than Mazda 5. Due to the lower power, Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda 5, 8 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 115 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 115 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 500 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1734 litres | 1678 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C4 Picasso (by 56 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda 5, which means Citroen C4 Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`050 kg | 2`110 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`489 kg | 1`400 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 561 kg | 710 kg | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 27 procentiem less than Mazda 5. Therefore, Mazda 5 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 5 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Citroen C4 Picasso, so Citroen C4 Picasso quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Mazda 5 has
| |