Citroen C4 Picasso 2007 vs Kia Carens 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Kia Carens is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 30 HP less power than Kia Carens, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Kia Carens. Due to the lower power, Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carens, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carens. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Kia Carens 2006 2.0 engine: The Hyundai/Kia 2.0 CRDi engine with the D4EA code is a cast-iron diesel unit introduced in the early 2000s. It is known for solid durability and, when properly maintained, can often reach 300,000–400,000 km. The engine appeared in several versions over the years. Early variants produced around 112 hp with a conventional ... More about Kia Carens 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C4 Picasso is 8 cm shorter than the Kia Carens, 1 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1734 litres | 2106 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Kia Carens may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Carens (by 372 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.7 metres more than that of the Kia Carens, which means Citroen C4 Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`050 kg | 2`275 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`489 kg | 1`610 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 561 kg | 665 kg | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem less than Kia Carens. Therefore, Kia Carens is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Kia Carens has
| |