Citroen C4 Picasso 2007 vs Ford C-Max 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 215 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 20 HP more power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Ford C-Max. Despite the higher power, Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 4.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C4 Picasso could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
950 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.47 m | 4.33 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.60 m | |
Citroen C4 Picasso is larger. Citroen C4 Picasso is 14 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 1 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 8 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 550 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
Ford C-Max has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen C4 Picasso has 50 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. This could mean that the Citroen C4 Picasso uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Citroen C4 Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`180 | 1`920 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | high | |
Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Picasso has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2200 | 2200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 4.8/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |