Citroen C4 Picasso 2010 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 10 HP less power than Renault Grand Scenic, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Renault Grand Scenic. Due to the lower power, Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.6 | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Scenic, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4, Peugeot 5008 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Grand Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Grand Scenic 2009 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is smaller, but slightly higher. Citroen C4 Picasso is 9 cm shorter than the Renault Grand Scenic, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 208 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 208 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 500 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2063 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`130 | 2`251 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Renault Grand Scenic has
| |