Citroen C4 Picasso 2010 vs Honda FR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 10 HP more power than Honda FR-V, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda FR-V, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda FR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 530'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C4 Picasso engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4, Peugeot 5008 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda CR-V, Honda Civic, Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Citroen C4 Picasso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is larger. Citroen C4 Picasso is 19 cm longer than the Honda FR-V, 2 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 439 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1049 litres | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage capacity. Citroen C4 Picasso has 61 litres more trunk space than the Honda FR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.8 metres more than that of the Honda FR-V, which means Citroen C4 Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`130 | 2`130 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Honda FR-V has
| |