Citroen C4 Picasso 2010 vs Peugeot 3008 2009
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso and Peugeot 3008 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 3008, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 3008. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Citroen C5, Peugeot 3008, Peugeot 2008, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 3008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso is 21 cm longer than the Peugeot 3008, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1241 litres | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage capacity. Citroen C4 Picasso has 68 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 3008. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.3 metres more than that of the Peugeot 3008. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`015 | 2`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Peugeot 3008 has
| |