Citroen C4 Picasso 2010 vs Honda FR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Honda FR-V is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 20 HP less power than Honda FR-V, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Honda FR-V. Due to the lower power, Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda FR-V, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda FR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Citroen C5, Peugeot 3008, Peugeot 2008, Citroen C4 | Used also on Honda Civic | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Citroen C4 Picasso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is larger. Citroen C4 Picasso is 19 cm longer than the Honda FR-V, 2 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 439 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1049 litres | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage capacity. Citroen C4 Picasso has 61 litres more trunk space than the Honda FR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.8 metres more than that of the Honda FR-V, which means Citroen C4 Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`015 | 1`975 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Honda FR-V has
| |