Citroen C4 Picasso 2010 vs Dacia Lodgy 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 134 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 35 HP more power than Dacia Lodgy, whereas torque is 26 NM more than Dacia Lodgy. Thanks to more power Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.1 | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Lodgy, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Citroen C5, Peugeot 3008, Peugeot 2008, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Dacia Dokker, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Citroen C4 Picasso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso is 3 cm shorter than the Dacia Lodgy, 8 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 827 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 827 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 500 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.2 metres more than that of the Dacia Lodgy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`015 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Dacia Lodgy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Picasso has serious deffects in 135 percent more cases than Dacia Lodgy, so Dacia Lodgy quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Dacia Lodgy has
| |