Citroen C4 Picasso 2010 vs Volkswagen Touran 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 28 HP less power than Volkswagen Touran, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volkswagen Touran. Due to the lower power, Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen C4 Picasso is 7 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touran, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1989 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen C4 Picasso has 195 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Touran. This could mean that the Citroen C4 Picasso uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Volkswagen Touran has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Picasso has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Volkswagen Touran, so Volkswagen Touran quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |