Citroen C4 Picasso 2010 vs Ford Tourneo 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 22 HP more power than Ford Tourneo, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Ford Tourneo. Thanks to more power Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is larger, but lower. Citroen C4 Picasso is 15 cm longer than the Ford Tourneo, 4 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 610 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1734 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Tourneo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Citroen C4 Picasso uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Tourneo. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`050 kg | 2`110 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`489 kg | 1`490 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 561 kg | 620 kg | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem less than Ford Tourneo. Therefore, Ford Tourneo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Ford Tourneo has
| |