Citroen C4 Picasso 2010 vs Ford S-Max 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Ford S-Max is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 28 HP less power than Ford S-Max, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Ford S-Max. Due to the lower power, Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is smaller, but slightly higher. Citroen C4 Picasso is 30 cm shorter than the Ford S-Max, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 854 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 854 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 500 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2100 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford S-Max, so Citroen C4 Picasso quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |