Citroen C4 Picasso 2010 vs Ford C-Max 2010

 
Citroen C4 Picasso
2010 - 2013
Ford C-Max
2010 - 2015
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 112 HP115 HP
Torque: 270 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.8 seconds11.3 seconds
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 3 HP less power than Ford C-Max, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.24.6
Real fuel consumption: 6.1 l/100km5.9 l/100km
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C4 Picasso could require 90 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres53 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1150 km in combined cycle1150 km in combined cycle
1330 km on highway1290 km on highway
980 km with real consumption890 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.38 m
Width: 1.83 m1.83 m
Height: 1.68 m1.63 m
Citroen C4 Picasso is larger.
Citroen C4 Picasso is 9 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 500 litres432 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1684 litres
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage capacity.
Citroen C4 Picasso has 68 litres more trunk space than the Ford C-Max.
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Citroen C4 Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0501`915
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

average
Ford C-Max has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Picasso has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 36004400
Pros and Cons: Citroen C4 Picasso has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Ford C-Max has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv