Citroen C4 Picasso 2010 vs Dacia Lodgy 2012

 
Citroen C4 Picasso
2010 - 2013
Dacia Lodgy
2012 - 2017
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 112 HP90 HP
Torque: 270 NM200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.8 seconds12.4 seconds
Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 22 HP more power than Dacia Lodgy, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Dacia Lodgy. Despite the higher power, Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.24.2
Real fuel consumption: 6.1 l/100km5.2 l/100km
The Dacia Lodgy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Lodgy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C4 Picasso could require 150 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Lodgy.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1150 km in combined cycle1190 km in combined cycle
1330 km on highway1310 km on highway
980 km with real consumption960 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.50 m
Width: 1.83 m1.75 m
Height: 1.68 m1.68 m
Citroen C4 Picasso is 3 cm shorter than the Dacia Lodgy, 8 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Seats: no data7 seats
Trunk capacity: 500 litres827 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data827 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 500 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.2 metres more than that of the Dacia Lodgy.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0501`870
Safety: no data
Quality:Dacia Lodgy has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Picasso has serious deffects in 135 percent more cases than Dacia Lodgy, so Dacia Lodgy quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 42007200
Pros and Cons: Citroen C4 Picasso has
  • more power
  • lower price
Dacia Lodgy has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv